Epic? Can you qualify? One might want to evaluate the uniqueness of the sourcing. If one source is merely echoing what others are saying, that's a few notches under "epic" in my book. Obviously, the shooter's name is big, and it had some major short-term consequences, but I suspect those were not irreversible -- again, not quite epic. Curiously, one of the questions Margaret Sullivan mentioned was regarding the guns used. And last check the paper had reversed again (authorities confirming that a rifle *was* used). It would be handy to have a contextual scorecard here -- if Media Bugs is running out of steam, then perhaps someone else.